Subscribe to the Social Media Lab Podcast via iTunes | Stitcher | Spotify | Google Play | RSS
Surely you’ve heard of evergreen content by now, right?
Ahrefs defines evergreen content in this way:
“Evergreen content is content that doesn’t go out of date. It revolves around a topic that’s always relevant to readers, regardless of the current news cycle or season. Its name comes from the evergreen—a plant that retains its green leaves all year round.”
Michael Stelzner of Social Media Examiner was quite vocal in 2017 that evergreen content was “dead” in his opinion.
“As a matter of fact, I would say it’s so dead that we no longer re-share any of our content on Twitter. We do nothing Evergreen. Everything we post is once and done on social media. On Facebook, we do post a couple of recurring posts, but we have decided that we are no longer doing anything more than just once with social media.”
However, Scott Ayres found recently here in the Social Media Lab that Jeff Bullas is repeating his link tweets multiple times per month and continues to receive clicks:
Granted this is on Twitter for Jeff, so may not correlate to Facebook Reach and engagement levels.
It’s been difficult to find research about the impact of using evergreen content on Facebook.
Based on these sources and my own social media experience, this is my hypothesis:
Evergreen content will see a decrease in Reach and Engagement the more it is posted to each social media platform.
I ran this experiment on my business page: The Social Media Hat with 7,357 fans.
Schedule
The test started on Monday, December 4, and concluded on Sunday, December 31 for a full 4-week experiment. While that included two major holiday periods (Christmas and New Year), my experience has been that those days see only a marginal drop-off in social engagement. While many are spending time offline, even more users are off work and free to be online, so it’s somewhat of a wash. Therefore, I continued the posting even on Christmas Day.
The following time slots were used based on past performance:
Facebook: 7am, 11am, 3pm
All automated and recurring queues were paused during the test period to ensure there would be no other shares of these same posts. However, I did continue to share new content and other spontaneous shares as I normally would.
I scheduled all posts in advance using Agorapulse so that everything would run according to plan without me having to remember to do anything. This was particularly important due to the holidays and traveling season!
Content
All posts were all link shares, meaning they were scheduled as a link with text so that each network would also display a link preview.
Custom text was used for each, rather than the default article title, but the custom text was repeated.
Also, no hashtags or mentions were used which might have had an impact on an individual share’s metrics.
Posting three times a day for 28 days, with a desire to be able to post the same content multiple times, resulted in a need for 12 pieces of content. With that schedule, I was able to repeat the same posts 7 times over that 28 day period.
That frequency also gave me the added benefit of being able to share each article once on every day of the week to mitigate any “better day of the week” advantage that might be present.
These articles I linked to were evergreen posts chosen from my archive based on their tremendous past success, as well as the variety of topics and interests. They ranged from 30 days old to several years, and none had been shared recently to the networks in question.
The normal expectation would be that I would see tremendous backlash from both the networks and my audience for posting that much.
But that was exactly one of the concepts I wished to test, so we needed to push conventional wisdom and traditional marketing “rules” a bit.
Between Agorapulse and the native platforms, I was able to retrieve each post’s engagement and reach metrics.
The Facebook reporting within Agorapulse was even easier, as all of the Engagement, Reach and Click data is available within the standard report.
After the experiment period was over, I tabulated all of the results within a Google spreadsheet so that I could easily set up calculations for things like Average Reach or Total Engagement.
Posting link shares 3 times a day without trying to get your audience active and engaged is not going to be viewed favorably by the Facebook algorithm.
Plus with recent news feed changes just announced by Mark Zuckerberg, I expected to see a drop in Facebook Reach
To break down the stats, we’ll look at the Facebook Reach of the 1st and last post for each article during the test:
Comparing all 12 links’ starting Reach and ending Reach, we see a decrease of 49.35% in Facebook Reach during this experiment.
I mentioned earlier that the reach of Facebook posts tended to decline as the month wore on.
This is true for all posts which means that even though 76.49% of my Facebook reach that month was on repeated posts, it’s clearly not a winning strategy on its own.
Yet, interestingly, it’s unlikely that it was the same fans who saw those same posts during the experiment since 66.28% of the engagement and 69.23% of the link clicks came after the initial share.
Let’s look at a specific example to illustrate what I’m referring to.
The article, “Give Your Social Networks The Spring Cleaning They So Desperately Need” was a fairly average performer on Facebook during this experiment. It was shared at 3:00pm (GMT -6) on Tuesday, December 5, and then again at the same time on the 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29.
As you can see, reach for this post actually rose the 2nd and 3rd times it was shared, then varied a bit the last few times. The third share was the most successful overall with 5 engagements and 2 link clicks from over 100 reached.
If we just focused on the Reach of the initial post and last post, we’d assume evergreen content was a failure based on the decrease in Facebook Reach.
Every link post in this experiment saw similar results as the one above — Reach would go up, down, up, down throughout the test. The same with engagement on the posts.
Which makes this really difficult to draw a solid conclusion.
So what did we learn from all of this?
First, not only is there nothing wrong with sharing your content a few more times to Facebook, it actually might help!
Each successive share can generate more views and engagement, clicks and potential leads for your business.
Which means that, over time, you can keep sharing your evergreen content over and over, increasing each piece of content’s ability to drive business results.
We also saw evidence that just sharing your content over and over isn’t enough. That it pays to introduce your posts in a way that will encourage discussion and engagement.
Remember, at the end of the day, these social networks are just that… social. Brands that just want to broadcast their messages will be easily dismissed by both the network and the fans.
Instead, effort must be put toward creating a sense of community among your fans and followers. Let them know that you genuinely care about their concerns and interests. Give them a platform to be heard, and they’ll reward you by listening to you in return!
Recall our original hypothesis:
Evergreen content will see a decrease in Reach and Engagement the more it is posted to each social media platform.
I’m going to say this is inconclusive based on the facts we have — primarily after seeing Reach and Engagement fluctuate throughout the test.
Oh, and there’s one final lesson… KEEP TESTING!
In the midst of this test I saw other interesting aspects, and came up with even more questions, which will need to be tested. And even though these are the results I saw, you might see completely different results!
Evergreen content can and should be queued up and shared to Facebook repeatedly. But there are some “rules” that this experiment helped reinforce:
We know that Facebook is continuing to favor engaging content and brands over those that push out information. Frankly, you just can’t afford to share link after link today. Your organic reach will eventually fall to practically zero.
Sharing evergreen content in and of itself is great, and I strongly encourage you to get the help of a tool like Agorapulse to make sure it’s done on schedule, but it has to be done right.
When you’re setting up those shares, take the time to craft interesting, engaging introductions that invite your fans to participate. With Facebook more than any other network, driving traffic can no longer be the goal.
It’s all about engagement. That’s the only way to remain visible and, therefore, viable, on the network.
Focus on engagement to build up interest and organic reach in your posts and the clicks will follow.
Set yourself up with Agorapulse if you haven’t already, and start scheduling and monitoring your post-performance. Test different sharing rates and frequencies, as well as different sharing times and styles!
Meanwhile, we’ll keep asking questions and running tests of our own.